evolution and creation allegory youtube debate

On YouTube there are vigorous discussions regarding Evolution and Creation. I usually point out that Origin of Species, a foundational doctrine of Evolution, has never been observed in action. Of course i know an even deeper error in the Evolutionary theology is that they have no explanation for how life appeared, but since they usually punt that question away to abiogenesis, you cannot really have a discussion about life origins. That is why i choose species origins, as they all agree that this doctrine is part of Evolution. And yes, i know the crux of the whole Evolutionary religion is that the leaders and believers of it want to find a way to forget God, as God will hold us all accountable for what we do in this life. But again, they just pooh-pooh such talk as being a “belief system”, “unobserved”, and “contrary to science”. So that is why i try to show that their “science” is really a belief system, as no one actually observed anything happening millions of years ago.

Today i wrote up a little allegory for YouTube commenters. It is exactly 500 letters long to fit the YouTube comment limit. Any advice or comments on this would be appreciated.
——————————–
An owner of a field brought many parts to it, and then left on a trip after writing down what he did. Some people came along later who didn’t like the field owner, saw the parts, and said that they got there as a result of a big explosion. They made everything match their belief, not the words of the field owner, and often not even their observations. The parts observed by those who believed the field owner and those who didn’t were the same.

What should the field owner do when he comes back?

1 thought on “evolution and creation allegory youtube debate”

  1. This is my understanding of the allegory.

    “An owner [God] of a field brought many parts to it [systems in nature], and then left on a trip after writing down what he did [Bible]. Some people came along later who didn’t like the field owner [athiests], saw the parts [scientific observation], and said that they got there as a result of a big explosion [Big Bang theory]. They made everything match their belief [subjectivity], not the words of the field owner [objectivity], and often not even their observations [dishonesty]. The parts observed by those who believed the field owner and those who didn’t were the same [objective external reality].

    What should the field owner do when he comes back? [with those who willfully chose to perceive things differently than what is recorded in God’s Word]”

    Atheists would argue that they cannot dislike a being they don’t believe exists.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *