13 Responded To This Post

mygif
1934. George ayieko said in August 9th, 2007

This is serious – How will you stand before a court of Law to defend the Word of God when you very well believe this word (the bible) has mistakes! What book will you quote?

George (Switzerland)

mygif
2100. David said in September 12th, 2007

The quote below from Early Writings pages 220 and 221 indicates that there were some changes to the Bible when it was being copied back when copies were few. This does not indicate that it was uninspired as written originally in any way. Remember 2 Timothy 3:16. “All Scripture…”
David
I saw that God had especially guarded the Bible; yet when copies of it were few, learned men had in some instances changed the words, thinking that they were making it more plain, when in reality they were mystifying that which was plain, by causing it to lean to their established views, which were governed by tradition. But I saw that the Word of God, as a whole, is a perfect chain, one portion linking into and explaining another. True seekers for truth need not err; for not only is the Word of God plain and simple in declaring the way of life, but the Holy Spirit is given as a guide in understanding the way to life therein revealed. {EW 220.2}

mygif
2106. daniel said in September 22nd, 2007

Just some more searching today reveals two interesting sites related to the issue of inspiration. One is by professor Damsteegt at Andrews University. He is quite strong in his belief that the Bible is “the word of God”, and “the words of God”.
http://www.andrews.edu/~damsteeg/Inspir.html

The second one appears to be an anti-SDA, anti-Ellen White site. But it brings up two or three very interesting things not known to most of us SDAs:
1. The writings of Ellen White have been changed.
2. The church does not believe her writings or the Bible itself are directly from God.
3. The book “Sketches from the Life of Paul” (1883) is basically just a copy of some else’s book, so to avoid problems, the SDA publishing houses stopped printing it.
http://giveshare.org/churchhistory/sda/egwhiterewrite.html

There is a very interesting quote in the above article:
In the November 19, 1992 issue of the Adventist Review, the faithful were given notice of the legitimacy of rewriting Ellen White. On page 8, Paul A. Gordon, secretary of the White Estate asked: “Is it legitimate to change, abridge, or simplify Ellen White’s writing? The answer is yes. We can change, abridge, or simplify the words, but we do not have license to change the intended message. Here’s why: Seventh-day Adventists do not hold to verbal inspiration. That means we do not believe that God dictated the words for Ellen White to use.”

mygif
2298. daniel said in January 9th, 2008

Got a email today from Brother Eugene Prewitt. He is the Literature Evangelist Director and Educator of Ouachita Hills College.

I heard an inspiring sermon by him on parallels between Elijah and God’s end-time church, and i sent him a email asking him to consider that the 3 1/2 year time frame is also directly linked to the 144,000. His reply was very much against that, but he said something against the belief that the Bible is “dictated”.
So i sent him a quote from the 1858 Great Controversy showing that it IS dictated, and below is his convoluted reply:
===============================
“Regarding dictation: It is a circular business. If the words are dictated, then the word ‘dictated’ means what you understand it to mean. If the words are not dictated, but are rather chosen by the prophet, than “dictated” could be just a not-best choice for expressing the origin of the words, as in “Satan is the authority behind mediums and makes them contradict things they wrote by means of the authority of the Holy Spirit.”
The less clear passage, by rational hermeneutic, should be made clear by more on-topic statements. In other words, an article on the topic of inspiration and its nature is worth ten times as much as an inference from the choice of words in an article on another topic.”

mygif
2457. R Thomas said in June 27th, 2008

I understand that you believe God dictated the words of the Bible and Ellen White’s writings. I understand that you believe they are inerrant.

How do you view the translation of Ellen White’s writings? For example in Pidgin (PNG) there are simply not enough words in the vocabulary to convey the message as it was originally.

mygif
2466. daniel said in July 16th, 2008

I’ve translated this 1858 Great Controversy into Japanese, and know that everything CAN be translated accurately (altho i did make some mistakes). If something needs to be added, then it can be italicized like in the English Bible.
.
For Pidgin, perhaps you have to make up new words to get it all across, i don’t know.

mygif
2469. R Thomas said in July 16th, 2008

Thank you for your reply. God bless in your work of translation.

mygif
2577. Thomas Tucker said in November 6th, 2008

daniel, don’t pay much attention to those who engage in higher criticism of the Bible and the spirit of Prophesy. they are looking for reasons to doubt God’s word and when the time comes, they will give up the 3rd Angel’s message and join the world.

As for mistakes in the Bible, that is absurd, the scriptures themselves say that every word of God [even though given through a human agent] is inspired. If God is God and so powerful, surely He can preserve His word for us through the ages.

I don’t think God dictated the entire scripture, but He inspired the men to relate the truths given to them through their own words so as to be able to express it in a way we can understand.

Read the introduction to The Great Controversy, v-vi. This says it all!

One other thing, EG White warned us that leaders and men in high places who are either full of ego, or think they are great intellectuals, will try to lead the flock into error. I had to fight against this when a theology major at Southern [at that time SMC]years ago, and I confront this sort of thing here in America all of the time. Its scary!

Tom, film and TV producer

mygif
2611. Denton Brunken said in December 7th, 2008

How many pages in your 1858 GC I would like to obtain one-I have been told that there was over 1500 pages in the original.
Elijah David.

mygif
2614. daniel said in December 9th, 2008

Denton, This book i am trying to spread is often called “Spiritual Gifts Volume 1″ today. I’m just trying to print it in a more attractive manner, and cheaper, and by this, spreading it more widely.
.
Review and Herald has recently split this book off from Spiritual Gifts Volume 2, and put it in paperback form. The url is here:
http://www.reviewandherald.com/newproducts/
product.pl?type=sku&sku=9780828016315
.
In the original book, there are 219 pages, and the page size is small.

mygif
2616. jesus is lord said in December 10th, 2008

Didn’t ellen white say to worship not on a saturday is the mark of the beast 666? Any way the bible is perfect not ellen white.

mygif
2623. daniel said in December 22nd, 2008

What Ellen White wrote in her published books is just as perfect as in the Bible, because it is from the same spirit.
.
In the future, when there are laws enforcing Sunday observance. then those who keep Sunday will receive the Mark of the Beast. I believe it is at that time that those who refuse the Mark of the Beast, will receive the Seal of God. But the Seal of God may come first, i’m not sure.

mygif
3213. pedja said in September 5th, 2009

What then is the conclusion, lets say about the numbers 70 and 75? What do you believe is the correct number?

Leave A Reply

Go Back To Home in germany | one year on

 Username

 Email Address

 Website

Please Note: Comment Moderation Maybe Active So There is No Need To Resubmit Your Comments